Words on the Move

December 5, 2016
McWhorter (The Language Hoax) will make word snobs clutch their pearls and gasp in dismay as he convincingly argues that they should “shed the contempt: the acrid disgust so many people seem to harbor for people who use the forms we have been taught are ‘bad.’ ” McWhorter shows the mutability that lies at the core of all language, exploring words that transition from semantic to pragmatic use, the evolution of word meanings, words that become grammar, changes in pronunciation over time, and the ways words combine to form new words. Along the way he specifically addresses infamous irritants such as using “literally” figuratively, uptalk, and speech peppered with “like.” Contextualizing them in lexical history, McWhorter shows how they are similar to other changes we now take for granted (such as the evolution of the suffix -like into the common adverbial ending -ly). McWhorter employs a jocular style that makes for smooth reading, without sacrificing the complexity of the subject. Sometimes the humor is a bit stretched, but the overall effect is an unintimidating welcome to readers new to the subject that pleasantly relaxes the discourse of grammar propriety. Agent: Katinka Matson, Brockman.

A brisk look at how and why words change.In his 17th book investigating the variety, history, and idiosyncrasy of language, McWhorter (English and Comparative Literature/Columbia Univ.; The Language Hoax: Why the World Looks the Same in Any Language, 2014, etc.) enthusiastically makes the case that language is fluid. "It's always a safe bet that a word will not be tomorrow what it is today," he writes. Language is "something becoming rather than being" and "ever in flux; the changing is all there is." To support this idea, repeated throughout the book, McWhorter offers myriad, and often fascinating, word histories. The word "silly," for example, evolved from meaning "blessed" to "innocent" to "weak." Some words narrow or broaden their meanings: "apple" once referred to all fruit, and what we call "meat" used to be "flesh." The author devotes much discussion to "literally," which originally meant "by the letter" but has gained "purely figurative usage" to mean something closer to "actually." McWhorter is not bothered by this drift in meaning, but he realizes that some people are. "If the way so many people talk is okay, then what counts as a mistake?" he is often asked. He concedes that individual misuse or mispronunciations can't be defended, but he is on the lookout for widespread changes. "Nuclear," he writes, is pronounced "nucular" by some who, he suggests generously, may be modeling it on such words as "spectacular" and "tubular." Tracing patterns of changing sounds, the author notes that when verbs become nouns, the accent shifts backward: "It's why someone who re-BELS is a RE-bel." McWhorter also offers an intricate, if not fully convincing, etymology to defend the ubiquitous use of "like" in popular speech. Although he posits "no scientific grounds for considering any way of speaking erroneous in some structural or logical sense," he does acknowledge "that some ways of speaking are more appropriate for formal settings than others." As in most of his books, McWhorter proves to be a well-informed and cheerful guide to linguistics. COPYRIGHT(1) Kirkus Reviews, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

August 1, 2016
A brisk look at how and why words change.In his 17th book investigating the variety, history, and idiosyncrasy of language, McWhorter (English and Comparative Literature/Columbia Univ.; The Language Hoax: Why the World Looks the Same in Any Language, 2014, etc.) enthusiastically makes the case that language is fluid. Its always a safe bet that a word will not be tomorrow what it is today, he writes. Language is something becoming rather than being and ever in flux; the changing is all there is. To support this idea, repeated throughout the book, McWhorter offers myriad, and often fascinating, word histories. The word silly, for example, evolved from meaning blessed to innocent to weak. Some words narrow or broaden their meanings: apple once referred to all fruit, and what we call meat used to be flesh. The author devotes much discussion to literally, which originally meant by the letter but has gained purely figurative usage to mean something closer to actually. McWhorter is not bothered by this drift in meaning, but he realizes that some people are. If the way so many people talk is okay, then what counts as a mistake? he is often asked. He concedes that individual misuse or mispronunciations cant be defended, but he is on the lookout for widespread changes. Nuclear, he writes, is pronounced nucular by some who, he suggests generously, may be modeling it on such words as spectacular and tubular. Tracing patterns of changing sounds, the author notes that when verbs become nouns, the accent shifts backward: Its why someone who re-BELS is a RE-bel. McWhorter also offers an intricate, if not fully convincing, etymology to defend the ubiquitous use of like in popular speech. Although he posits no scientific grounds for considering any way of speaking erroneous in some structural or logical sense, he does acknowledge that some ways of speaking are more appropriate for formal settings than others. As in most of his books, McWhorter proves to be a well-informed and cheerful guide to linguistics.

COPYRIGHT(2016) Kirkus Reviews, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.